Ruther, Dick et al

I know this is a little bit like kicking a dead mule (did I just make that up, or is that a proverb that actually exists?), but just to point out again (after CIA-material pointed out that the world has become unsafer due to the Iraq War) that the invasion of Iraq was one of the most stupid decisions of the last century (and I still uphold my claim, that Bush is the worst President since Ruther B Hayes, Nixon not counting because he was a criminal and thus played in a different ballpark), check out what Michael Scheuer an Ex-CIA-operative had to say:

Iraq is in the Arab heartland and, far more than Afghanistan, is a magnet for mujahideen. You can see this in the large number of people crossing the border to fight us. It wasn't a lot at the start, but there's been a steady growth as the war continues. The war has validated everything bin Laden said: that the United States will destroy any strong government in the Arab world, that it will seek to destroy Israel's enemies, that it will occupy Muslim holy places, that it will seize Arab oil, and that it will replace God's law with man's law. We see Iraq as a honey pot that attracts jihadists whom we can kill there instead of fighting them here. We are ignoring that Iraq is not just a place to kill Americans; Al Qaeda has always said that it requires safe havens. It has said it couldn't get involved with large numbers in the Balkans war because it had no safe haven in the region. Now they have a safe haven in Iraq, which is so big and is going to be so unsettled for so long. For the first time, it gives Al Qaeda contiguous access to the Arabian Peninsula, to Turkey, and to the Levant. We may have written the death warrant for Jordan. If we pull out of Iraq, we have a problem in that we may have to leave a large contingent of troops in Jordan. All of this is a tremendous advantage for Al Qaeda. We've moved the center of jihad a thousand miles west from Afghanistan to the Middle East.

Will The Real ... Please Stand Up?

Ulrich Speck raises an interesting point in his blog (German). After Chavez ludicrous speech before the UN assembly followed (or precedented?) by Ahmadinejad's rant prompted Speck to wonder where in the world there is a serious antipole to George W. Considering the ridicolousness of Chavez and his lunatic side-kick (actually Chavez probably should be Doc Holiday to Ahmadinejad's posing as a gun-craving Wyatt Earp) one really has to be amazed that there is no national leader that would stand up to W at least every once in a while. Chirac is a lame duck already, Schröder cannot blindly follow his electorate anymore, Blair never was more than an American satrap anyway, now he is a lame duck too, while Merkel does dare to mention certain - before - unspeakable aspects (Guantanamo) she apparently does not have the will to try to form some kind of European front against the Bush's follies. The Chinese only care about their economy growth and the oil they need to fuel it, Lula has too many inner-state problems to worry about anything else, the smaller European nations (Zapatero, Prodi -- Kaczynski) are diametrically too opposed to ensure any kind of common European stand (making Solana as irrelevant as ever).

There seriously is no one who could be taken seriously and would present any kind of opposition to the current US-administration. A very sad state of affair this is.

Spin

I find it completely outreagous how the Bush administration is capable of spinning even something as clear-cut as this intelligence assesment in regard to the - negative - effects of the Iraq War on the War On Terror. It is just incredible.

NY Times & WP

Finally

Parts of the American institutional setting seem to have finally realized that what they are doing in Iraq is mainly create a rallying-ground for everyone with a grudge towards the West (WP / NY). Now, if I could only believe that someone responsible in the White House would act on this I'd be happy.

Plus, a really interesting article on a grand design the US supposedly follows in Asia. Am not sure I believe it whole-heartedly, interesting theory though.

Le Petit Nicolas

Le dernier livre, ce que j'ai lu, était Le Petit Nicolas de Jean-Jacques Sempé et René Goscinny. Sans vraiment connaît son nom Goscinny peut-être était l'écrivain le plus important de mon enfance. Il a écris Lucky Luke, Asterix & Obelix et aussi Le Petit Nicolas. Bien sur, je lisait tous en allemand. Mais, pour mon anniversaire quelqu'un a me donné le premier et le deuxième Petit Nicolas en francais (merci Franziska, merci Camille).

Je dois admettre que j'ai aimé le livre de noveau. La langue est pas trop difficile pour moi et les blagues sont génials quand même. Je ne vais pas vraiment décrire l'histoire ici, je suis sur que presque tous entre vous le connaissent. Le petit Nicolas est un garcon qui raconte ses aventures à l'école et chez lui, avec ses amis et tout seul. En résumé, moi j'ai l'aimé, achetez-vous ca!

Encore, si vous voulez, tous les rectification ont la bienvenue.

Stammheim

As much as people bitch about the Polish government - understandably so I might add - you have to give them credit for stepping up when the rest of Europe chickens out. How is the world supposed to ever take us seriously as a global player if we never dare to send any sufficient number of soldiers anywhere?

Und ein weiteres Buch,
Stammheim - Die Geschichte des Vollzugsbeamten Horst Bubeck von Kurt Oesterle. Das Buch ist irgendwann letztes Jahr rausgekommen und hatte in der Zeit eine ziemlich gute Besprechung bekommen, außerdem fand ich Stefan Austs Standardwerk über die RAF (Der Baader-Meinhof Komplex oder so ähnlich) sehr faszinierend, deswegen war die Geschichte des örtlich Verantwortlichen im siebten Stock Stammheims interessant für mich.
Ich fand das Ganze letzten Endes auch amüsant und zeitweise auch lehrreich, muß aber aus zwei Gründen vor dem Kauf abraten. Erstens ist die Diskussion zu einem ganz großen Teil eine der Vergangenheit, welche keinen Bezug zur Gegenwart mehr besitzt. Während Austs Werk mehr eine allgemeine Geschichte der RAF war, deren Ausläufer bis in die 90er aktiv waren, und gerade in Bezug auf den modernen Terrorismus interessante Parallelen aufzubieten hatte - sowohl auf Seiten der Terroristen wie auf Seiten des Staates, behandelt Oesterle doch nur einen sehr konkreten Aspekt in Bezug auf die RAF. Das Buch dreht sich im Prinzip nur um die Haftbedingungen in Stammheim, über welche damals von rechts und links aus sehr unterschiedlichen Gründen und mit sehr verschiedenen Resultaten spekuliert wurde. Mir, als Mensch der damals noch keine Zeitung las, hauptsächlich, weil ich noch nicht geboren war, ist diese Diskussion natürlich nicht sonderlich nahe gegangen und somit fehlt mir ein - für diese Buch glaube ich notwendiger - emotionaler Zugang. Zweitens schreibt Kurt Oesterle zwar kein schlechtes Deutsch, aber man merkt ihm an, daß er halt ein Journalist und kein Autor ist. Ich war nicht so begeistert von der Art wie das Buch geschrieben war.
Deswegen, ich fand es nett, habe es relativ schnell durchgelesen, würde es aber weder in meinen Sachbuch- noch in meinen Literaturkanon aufnehmen - nicht, daß es den bisher geben würde, aber was nicht ist, kann ja noch kommen.

Brave New World

There was a piece in today's New York Times that dealt with interrogation methods employed by the CIA. Shocking, that's all I can say. I cannot believe any person in his right state of mind can stand there and defend these techniques. A democracy just don't work that way.

I also re-read Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, a book I can endorse whole-heartedly. I do have to admit that I liked it better the last time I had read it though - when I was 16 maybe - why I am not quite sure. What I know I disliked this time around - which might have completely escaped my notice last time - was the presentation of free-spirited sex as something degenerative. This complete moral condemnation of a non-monogamous society contained a little too much of certain conservative strains for me.

Monsieur Ibrahim et les fleurs du Coran

J'ai commencé à essayer de lire en francais et pour cette raison je vais décrire les livres francais dans cet langue ici. Ca va être un peu embarrassant, quand même, si on essaye pas, on peux pas réussir. Tous les perfectionnement ont la bienvenue.

Éric-Emmanuel Schmitt a écrit Monsieur Ibrahim et les fleurs du Coran, il y a un film sur le roman, qui j'ai pas encore vu. L'édition laquelle j'ai lu a les mots difficile en bas, mais j'ai pas trouvé le livre vraiment difficile. Il s'agit de l'amitié entre un homme d'origine turc et un garcon juif, qui grandit de fait sans parents. Franchement, j'ai aimé bien le livre, mais je pense que dans un autre langue j'aurais une opinion differente. En francais j'était heureux que j'ai réussi à finir et comprendre le livre. Dans une langue que je parle mieux, je suis presque sûr que je le trouverais trop doux et un peu superficiel avec un sujet lequel on pourrait discuter vraiment profond. En même temps, je dois admettre que peut-être j'ai pas compri les éléments profond parfois, parce que mon francais est pas suffisant fort.

The Old Man and the Sea

I've been quite busy here, what, with my french courses during the day, working the week-end and at the same time having to read all my papers online. Yet, last week, before this all started in a way, I did manage to fit in a couple more books, which I now have to catch up on.
One of these was Ernest Hemingway's The Old Man and the Sea, I hadn't read this before, just knew that it was considered a classic and part of the (in?)famous literal canon. I really like Hemingway, he is not on the same level as people like Faulkner or Twain but he always provides a good read and did not disappoint this time around either. The story in itself is quite surprising as neither women nor booze play any kind of relevant role. An old fisher-man has not caught anything for more than 80 days, yet does not give up trying and is ultimately - in a way - rewarded or punished, however might one view the end. I am not going into anything else here as I don't want to destroy it for anyone wanting to read the novel. Let it suffice to say that it is a really recommendable book. I really enjoyed it. A word of warning though, due to its length - barely more than 100 pages in my version - and Hemingway's contracted writing stlye it took my not even half a day to finish it.

Der Tod In Venedig

Frei nach dem Motto 'Pack schlägt sich, Pack verträgt sich' (wenns ums
Geld geht)

http://www.tagesspiegel.de/medien/archiv/02.09.2006/2736166.asp

Ich muß mal wieder ein paar Bücher nachholen, werde aber auch bald mal kurz was über Paris schreiben, wo ich inzwischen schon fast seit einer Woche bin. Habe mein erstes Buch von Thomas Mann gelesen. Der Tod in Venedig. Mann war immer eine meiner Bildungslücken - die in Bezug auf deutsche Literatur aber irgendwie trotzdem immer noch sehr groß sind - deswegen hatte ich mir vor einiger Zeit diese Novellensammlung gekauft. Ich aber ganz ehrlich sagen, daß ich nicht vollends begeistert was. Die Geschichten sind natürlich handwerklich genial geschrieben, seine Sätze sind zeitweise einfach nur bewundernswert - und zwingen dem Leser desöfteren auch eine Wiederholung auf - trotzdem habe ich keinen rechten Zugang zu ihnen gefunden. Die Themen sind oft sehr klassisch - Eros wir unter anderem einmal aufgearbeitet, Tristan und Isolde, Moses - und ich muß zugeben, daß meine Vorkenntnisse wahrscheinlich zeitweise einfach nicht ausreichend sind, um diese Variationen vollkommen nachzuvollziehen. Nichtsdestotrotz gefielen mir drei der sechs Erzählungen gut - ein indisches Märchen, die Geschichte des Auszuges aus Ägypten, sowie der scheiternde, unbelehrbare, religiöse Fanatiker. Was mich glaube ich am meisten störte ist die Tatsache, daß Mann die Schreibkunst als solche offensichtlich als wichtiger erachtet als seine Geschichte - womit er ja im 20. Jahrhundert bei weitem nicht alleine ist - was aber leider dem Spannungsbogen abträglich ist.

Empfehle ich das Buch also weiter? Jein. Kaufen sollte man es sich vielleicht nicht unbedingt, aber wenn Ihr die folgenden Geschichten irgendwo sehen solltet holt sie Euch, bzw lest sie:
Die Vertauschten Köpfe, Das Gesetz, Gladius Dei.

Iraq, Vietnam and Nazi Germany

According to Donald Rumsfeld we all (each and every war critics that is) have not learned the lessons of history and are deemed guilty of appeasement towards terrorism by opposing (or having opposed maybe) the 3rd Gulf War. Now this would be quite ludicrous if it wasn't so sad. I wonder whether Rumsfeld forgot that he visited Iraq and Saddam personally in the 80s to ensure him of Reagan's support in his war against Iran (the 1st Gulf War), does that make good old Donald the über-appeaser or what? The Secretary of Defense even though he already served in the Nixon administration also conveniently forgets another lesson of history, namely the quagmire called Vietnam. In Indo-China of course the situation was quite different than how the one in Iraq looks like, yet more can and has to be learned from it than from the Accord of Munich and the ensuing 2nd World War.

Faithful to his pitbull the President has entered the fray now and given us his input and I am going to be quite honest about this, he is a liar:

"withdrawing now from Iraq would leave Americans at risk of terrorist attacks 'in the streets of our own cities'"

Yeah, right, how is that not distorting the truth? And I did not have sex with that woman deserved impeachment?

He also "cautioned Americans against concluding that five years after the Sept. 11 attacks the threat had receded" and thus he at least admits that his politics have been a complete failure.

So sad that people still fall for this folly.

Lastly, my name is Sensemania or sometimes LKwesiJ or even JDub and I endorse this message:
www.oneseat.eu

Lincoln County War

The last book I started on my Italy vacation turned out to be a rather tough one. I hadn't thought it would be scientific as it in reality was. History of the Lincoln County War - A classic account of Billy the Kid by Maurice G Fulton is quite intriguing anyway though. While the title is a little misleading - Billy the Kid is really only a subcharacter in the bigger scale of the Lincoln County War even if he is the most interesting one of the actual gun men - this is a very good description of the hold on power a few early entrepreneurs had on small towns, counties, states even in the early West. This grip-hold was quite simply ensured by violent measures - not that this comes as a surprise to anyone who has ever seen a Western - yet the brutality and even more so the amount of scheming and bribing that took place in the South West during the later half of the 19th century leaves one awe-struck. Without going into too much detail, the Lincoln County War pits one fraction (McSween, Tunstall, Chisum (yes, THAT Chisum) trying to break the grip on wealth and power another fraction (Dolan, Murphy, Ridley). The former group in the beginning tries to resort to lawful measures only, but when Tunstall is murdered they too become implicated in the fighting that overtakes Lincoln and its neighboring towns. Fulton offers a very detailed (in regard to name-dropping sometimes a little too detailed) account of the events surrounding these mythical men (OK, I might be exaggerating a little here, but then, if Billy the Kid and Chisum are not mythical, who else could make a claim for that?). The only downside to the book is the very old-fashioned style of writing (it is based on material recorded in the 30s) which at the same time is not as classy as Faulkner's for example, more like an old-fashioned scientific writing than an old-fashioned literary style (which I wouldn't have a problem with). This problem is compounded by long quotations of newspaper articles appearing during these New Mexican troubles written often by the protagonists of the war itself and accordingly not of the highest literal quality. Yet, I enjoyed it and while I would not recommend it to anyone who is not as obsessed with certain aspects of American history as I am, it was definitely worth whatever (I can't remember, it's been awhile) time I spent on it for me.

Lügen In Zeiten des Krieges

"Asked whether that [the situation in Iraq being as bad as it is right now] would be true if the United States had not invaded Iraq, Bush responded: 'Imagine a world in which Saddam Hussein was there, stirring up even more trouble in a part of the world that had so much resentment and so much hatred that people came and killed 3,000 of our citizens.'"

I cannot believe he still has the audacity to even imply that Saddam was in any way connected to 9/11, unbe-fuckin-lievable.

Concerning this topic it is good news that the American public seems to have developed a more sensible approach finally.

"Americans increasingly see the war in Iraq as distinct from the fight against terrorism, and nearly half believe President Bush has focused too much on Iraq to the exclusion of other threats, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll."

Wachstum

Sehr, sehr interessanter Artikel, welcher darstellt, daß nicht strukturelle Gründe für den schwachen Wachstum in den letzten Jahren geführt haben, sondern andere - temporäre - Anpassungseffekt hieran schuld waren. Da diese jetzt beseitigt seien, würde die Wirtschaft auch wieder schneller wachsen. Bzw andersherum, das hohe momentane Wachstum liegt daran, daß diese temporären Aspekte eliminiert wurden.

Der Autor gibt drei Probleme, welchen sich Deutschland inzwischen angepasst hat:

1 - Durch die Einführung des Euros verlor Deutschland Investitionsgelder die als Spekulation auf einen Kursanstieg der DM ins Land flossen, diese hatten deutschem Kapital jahrzehntelang - im internationalen Vergleich - niedrige Rendite ermöglicht, da der deutsche Finanzmarkt hierdurch vom internationalen abgekoppelt agierte.

2 - Mit der DM als Leitzins Europas war es der Bundesbank möglich die günstigsten Finanzierungsbedingungen zu schaffen, auch dies viel mit der Einführung des Euro weg.

3 - Da Kapital meist durch Anleihe bei Banken angesammelt wurde, bestand weniger Druck für hohe Rendite (da Banken keine kurzfristige Ausschüttung, sondern eine langfristige Rückzahlung ihrer Kredit erwünschen).

The War On Terror

Two articles caught my attention today. The first is a description of the judicial follow-up to Haditha - as a reminder, Marines there killed 24 civilians including many women and children. According to this article the commanding officer claimed that he had not considered the killings unusual, part of the regular routine so to speak, and for that reason did not initiate an investigation. If that is the case then obviously, this must happen so much more often than the world knows or ever will find out. Apart from the fact that the supposed American moral authority in this war thus becomes questionable, it also spells doom on their efforts in Iraq. No wonder civil war is erupting there if the American troops act like this and I can only repeat myself, what a mess Mr Bush has created there, unbelievable.

The second article is an Op-Ed from the NY Times arguing that American ties to Pakistan should be strengthened as they helped prevent attacks from occurring a few days ago. The authors go on to list various positive aspects of General Musharraf's regime. I simply cannot believe that in a war supposedly fought for the defense of the enlightenment, for the spreading of democracy (sorry, I like to get corny with stuff like this sometimes) what these two guys are advocating is to support a dictator who tight-fisted rules with the help of the military. History does repeat itself it seems, as long as the dictator's enemies are our enemies, the worst ones will be supported (Saddam in the 80s, Pinochet in the 70s, Mobutu, the Iranian Shah, the list goes on and on).

Seriously wonder how this struggle can ever be won by the West if this is how we fight it.

To Kill A Mockingbird

The third book I managed to read during my vacation was Harper Lee's classic To Kill A Mockingbird. This one of the 'must-reads' of American literature I hadn't read yet (there a others, but trust me their numbers are dwindling :d) and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Quite simple, a very good book. Harper Lee seems to be one of those JD Salinger type authors who pop up for one amazing book and then vanish from the public scene again.

The story is one of a young girl and her brother growing up with their father alone in a small Southern town. While sampling many aspects in the novel, the authors most important strain is the trial of a black man accused of raping a white woman (THE perpetual fear of Southerners most likely brought about by the fact that white men had been raping black women for centuries by then, no, I guess I'm just kidding). The father is his attorney and tries to defend this hard-working upright citizen against the charges brought against him by a family residing on the lowest rung of the social ladder. The narrator is an 8-year old girl (the American obsession with young narrators is really quite intriguing btw, Catcher In The Rye, Huckleberry Finn...) telling the story out of her naive point of view.

Again, a really good book, I ate it up, finishing it in a day and a half (or something like that). I recommend it to anyone. One point of criticism does apply though. This is of a very similar nature to the attacks launched on Uncle Tom's Cabin and others later (like, again, Huckleberry Finn). While it is obvious that the author sympathizes with the plight of the American black men (including women in this, maybe people would be more appropriate) the portrayal of the few black characters that appear in this novel are quite unflattering. The woman taking care of Atticus' (the father) household is the stock character of the unselfish, nice black mother figure that takes care of the children as if they are their own. Yet, she is the only black character developing any kind of depth, even if hers is very shallow indeed. Every black character (including the, surely educated to some degree, reverend) address Jem (the 13-year old brother of the narrator) as Sir. He is thirteen for God's sake. Lee seems to fall for the typical white Southern, she does so well-intentioned, but yet her description of the race problem in the South explores the topic from one side exclusively, making it lack in profoundness to a certain degree.

The Time Of Our Singing

The Time Of Our Singing was written by Richard Powers and follows a biracial family and how their lifes play out over the background of the 2nd World War, the Civil Rights Movement into Reagan's presidency.
The father - a German Jew - and the mother - a black woman from a well-respected and educated Philadelphia family - meet and decide to marry in the late 30s. As they are both musically inclined - the mother having been an aspiring classical singer - they teach sing with their children from an early age on, leading to the two sons developing an astounding classical musical talent. Yet, racial problems lead to an estrangement of the mother from her family and - later - of the daughter from her father. Ultimately it seems as if race trumps family and even love. The three children in various degrees seem to fail in their attempt to deal with their mixed heritage.

The book was an engulfing read even though - and I believe some people might consider this a reason for the quality of the book - the too prominent and frequent descriptions of the families or the two sons singing or performing music. Powers tries to portray music as an all-compassing, all-explaining medium, which might even be true but in a literal description and with this kind of repetitiveness it creates boredom. Less annoying, but also overdone where the detailing of physics in which the father indulges himself in - he is a professor at Columbia. These discussions also lead to a very bizarre and lame meta-physical ending which not only seems unnecessary but also contrary to the logic deployed in the rest of the book.

What made the book intriguing was the children's attempt to deal with their position in the world which does not approve of them. Their heritages seemingly cannot be combined. Powers does a very good job of describing the narrator - the younger brother - and his sentiments, his attempts at dealing with being a black classical pianist who is of German and Jewish heritage and thus not being able to fit in either world.

Yet, some more criticism is valid and obligatory.
1 - The father never appropriately learns English but always falls back on using some German in his everyday speech. This of course is totally unrealistic for someone who has no family but his only English-speaking wife and kids and works and teaches in an American university. Powers also commits the occasional blunder in regard to his attempts to introduce these German phrases. Once for example the father proclaims that someone might be 'burning a path for himself'. The word should be 'blazing' of course but since there is no equivalent saying like this in German there is no reason whatsoever for the character to blunder like this. Either he knows the saying or he does not, there is no wrong translation of a saying that does not exist in the other language.

2 - According to Powers the father can 'never be more to her [the wife] than almost recognizable, a stranger to her blood, the father of her children' making it sound as if a black man would be able to become more but him because of his skin colour cannot. I do not know what skin colour Powers has - and I do not intend to find out - but this whole BS of skin colour in any way inherently influencing who you are is ludicrous.

3 - The older brother is compared with various classical figures in the headlines to some chapters such as Aeneas and Job. I am relatively familiar with both of these and truth to be told I found no resemblance between that brother and either of those figures. Bizarre usage of classical references.

So, do I recommend the book? After all this criticism probably should be a clear-cut no. Yet, it is not, I liked reading it. Admittedly, it probably helps that I read quite fast making it easy for me to race through the musical parts, but the portrayed mindset and decisions made by characters from a biracial background during the 60s were interesting even if I did not agree with most of them.

The Hamlet

I am in a transient living situation right now, which means I haven't set up my harddrives here, which translates to there being no title songs for a lil...

Apart from that I had a nice and relaxing vacation in Italy and finally got around to read a couple of books again - if not as many as I would have liked to. I will post on these books over the next few days.

The first one I read was The Hamlet by William Faulkner. This actually might be the hardest one to write anything about. Just saying it is by Faulkner seems to be enough. He is hands-down one of the greatest writers - if not the single greatest - I have ever read. The Hamlet he wrote in 1940 and it describes Flem Snopes beginning rise to power in Yoknapatawpha County. It is the first part of a trilogy about the Snopes family in general. In a way I guess it could be described as vintage Faulkner containing pre-marital sex, violence and even bestiality. Yet, these outbursts of the ugly side of life is not what Faulkner focuses on, rather it is the ruthless rise of Flem Snopes who slowly takes over Frenchman's Bend.

Flem in a lot of ways resembles the carpet-bagger who comes in from the North and through his bold and ruthless measures overpowers the naive locals, only that he himself alos comes from a poor, white sharecropping family. The only individual capable of putting up any kind of resistance to Flem is Ratliff. He also is a successful and scheming dealer and wheeler, but he always stays in the limits of Southern courteousy, thus limiting himself in his actions against Flem. If Ratliff can be taken as a symbol for the Old South then and Flem as one for Modernity arriving in the backwaters of Mississippi, it should be quite clear who will win in the end.

This in itself is nothing new for a Faulner novel. They all seem to deal with the vanishing of the Old South. Yet, they do so in manners and stories that differ a lot from each other and Faulkner's eloquence and powerful imagery ensur that the reader (read: me) is always grasped by the unfolding events. While it is clear that in a Faulkner Pantheon The Hamlet need not be included and that for the uninitiated reader I would propose to start out with Absalom, Absalom or Intruder in the Dust, this, like all of Faulkner's novels really, is a very intruiging and interesting book that I would recommend anyone to pick up if the see it anywhere. I know that I will get myself the latter two books of the trilogy when I see them somewhere and my reading schedule and budget allow for it to happen.

Me And My Chaffeur Blues

Maria Muldaur - Me And My Chaffeur Blues
The sexuality of this music is really quite amazing considering how old it is and considering how much of conservative backlash certain things still produce, but 'I want you to ride me' might refer to her new Mustang only as well I guess.

So, after the last two horrible weeks of no fun and games, but virtually only studying economics tout le jour, I am finally on vacation. Will be going to Italy tomorrow and stay there for 10 days. Shortly after that it will be off to Paris to begin my studies there. I am really looking forward to this vacation now, finally one which I can actually claim I deserve, and after that studying in Paris and improving my french should be fun. I'll definitly be more of a frequent writer on here, once I am back from the communication-hole that Italy represents for me.

On add-on, tomorrow morning I am going to take a TOEFL exam (Test Of English As A Foreign Language), I need that in order to apply to exchange programs with the US (which I intend to do quite soon, apply that is, see whether they actually take me). The maximum in points achievable is 120, a certain arrogance in regard to my knowledge of the English language makes me claim that anything below 110 will be an utter disappointment for me. I am kind of curious to see whether I'll be able to fulfill my own expectations.

R.A.G.U.

Ghostface Killah - R.A.G.U. - ft Raekwon
From the new - and very decent - Ghostface Killah album.

I finally found a place to stay in Paris. Can't even begin to describe how happy I am about this, I had been looking on and off for like two months. Things either were too expensive or the people didn't make a sympathetic impression or they were foreigners whose french wouldn't help mine. So, now I finally found a place in the 18th district (just a 'lil north of Sacre-Coeur for those of you who know Paris a bit), the apartment is shared with a french guy. Ja, all perfect :).

Also I wrote the first of my three exams today, have two more coming up now, one (Economics I) tomorrow and the other one (Economics III) on tuesday. The one today was about Foreign US Trade Policy. Quite interesting actually. The whole thing was split into two essays for each of which we had three subjects to choose from. I wrote about trade theories (this whole Ricardo, comparative advantages and so on, really interesting that) and the possibilty of Congress not extending the President's Trade Promotion Authority next year. Kind of weird that I am actually fascinated with some of this macroeconomics stuff now. I mean most of this micro-BS I can't stand, so boring, don't even know how the guys who study this (hallo alle BWLer) survive, but macroeconomic policy is really cool.

Anyway, back to my schedule of little sleep and less entertainement (like reading the paper for exemple or continueing my novel, fuck, I'm dying for my vacation).